On May 9, 2025, the U.S. Copyright Office released a “pre-publication” version of Part Three of its planned reports on the intersection between copyright and generative artificial intelligence (“AI”). Titled “Part 3: Generative AI Training,” the Report addresses whether AI companies may use copyrighted material to train their product. Part
Continue Reading Sneak Peek: Copyright Office Releases Pre-Publication Version of Third Report on Generative AI
On June 19, 2025, the New York State Fashion Workers Act (the “Act”) goes into effect, triggering numerous changes to the current employment structure for models in New York. The Act,[1] which Governor Hochul signed into law in December 2024, amends New York’s Labor Law to establish new responsibilities
Continue Reading Model Law: The New York State Fashion Workers Act
On February 11, 2025, a U.S. District Court in Delaware issued a decision of first impression finding that a technology startup’s use of copyrighted materials to train its artificial intelligence platform infringed the copyright holder’s rights and did not constitute fair use.[1] The Delaware District Court is the
Continue Reading Those Who Teach, Can’t: U.S. District Court in Delaware Issues Decision of First Impression, Finding Use of Copyrighted Materials to Train Artificial Intelligence Constitutes Infringement, Not Fair Use
On January 29, 2025, the U.S. Copyright Office released Part Two of its planned reports on the intersection between copyright and generative Artificial Intelligence (“AI”). Titled “Part 2: Copyrightability,” the Report addresses a hot issue—the extent to which AI-generated outputs are entitled to copyright protection. The Report, after examining the
Continue Reading Copyright Office Issues Second Report on Generative AI: Copyright Protection Requires Human Authorship, But What Does That Mean For Generative AI?
A lawsuit pending before Judge J. Paul Oetken of the District Court for the Southern District of New York may soon underscore the need to rethink the legal remedies available for potential legal violations aided by generative Artificial Intelligence (“AI”).[1] As discussed previously on this blog, in July
Continue Reading Lehrman v. Lovo, Inc.: Voice Actors Take on AI Voice Generation
On December 16, 2024, Shira Perlmutter, head of the U.S. Copyright Office,[1] provided the relevant subcommittees of the Senate and House Judiciary Committees with an update on the Copyright Office’s ambitious investigation into the intersection of generative Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) and copyright law and policy.[2]
In August 2023
Continue Reading Copyright Office Delays Remaining Generative AI Report
On July 31, 2024, the U.S. Copyright Office issued the first of several planned reports on the intersection between copyright and generative Artificial Intelligence (“AI”), following a lengthy period of public comment, during which it received more than 10,300 comments, discussed previously on this blog. Titled “Part 1: Digital Replicas,”
Continue Reading Copyright Office Issues First Report on Generative AI
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools—defined by the U.S. Copyright Office as technology that is “capable of producing outputs such as text, images, video, or audio (including emulating a human voice) that would be considered copyrightable if created by a human author”[1]—are trained by analyzing vast amounts of data
Continue Reading U.S. Copyright Office Examines Copyright and Generative AI
A September 27, 2023 decision by a Manhattan trial court, Aicon Art LLC v. Aicon Contemporary LLC, No. 650580/2023, 2023 N.Y. Slip. Op. 33340(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Sept. 27, 2023), involving a dispute between two businesses located in the same art gallery, serves as a reminder to New York
Continue Reading Aicon Art LLC v. Aicon Contemporary LLC: A Reminder About the Importance of Knowing Who the Client Is
A pair of copyright decisions issued in May, one involving the appropriation artist Richard Prince[1] and the other involving works portraying the musician known as Prince, explore and expand on the “fair use” defense to copyright infringement. On May 11, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Continue Reading Fair Use: Graham v. Prince and Warhol v. Goldsmith